Lastly, the horizontal orientation between Libertine and Libertarian is the least hostile. Without such agreement, Libertines and Royals almost never associate, their presences in society rarely if ever overlapping.Īs there is agreement on economy, albeit with the difference between socialism without and with fascism (the agreement between Libertine and Psychiatrist is to social contract theory-they agree there should be a social contract but disagree on what social contract it should be), there is overlapping presence in society and an inherent ideological difference. It is not as hostile because there is no agreement on an economy. It is important to point out the line between Libertines and Royals (apex right-authoritarians) is diagonal and this orientation is not as hostile as the vertical orientation between Libertines and Psychiatrists. They are the the families which possess so much material affluence which they pass on from generation to generation, they often times are also the head of a religion or royal family within a monarchical state. The controllers of the authoritarian right, or capitalist authoritarians, are the dynastic oligarchs in banking. We might also go far as to say the political arrangement of socialist-fascism, it is anti-religious psychiatry-psychiatry already explained for what it is, more than this political ideology in society. In the last post, I discussed how psychiatrist best represent the Kings & Queens of the Authoritarian left. So then, to be a Libertine means there are three adversaries in the real world and each of whom would like to dominate or completely eliminate the Libertine from society. Like chess, the four player version has ancient origins and beyond this metaphor, politics is indeed no game for Libertines. Not to be confused with the self professed hedonism of Allister Crowley nor others of similar, non political, libertine pursuits in the Order of the Golden Dawn, Enochian chess was popularized by such people. To the extent chess is artful is the extent to which politics resembles the game. Its a matter of literacy beyond sentience. More than any other political philosophy, within the context of a Political Compass with four apex factions in competition for dominance in society.the Libertine insists politics is not a game. If anyone ever happens to find themselves in the USA and within the context of their political life they cannot help nor deny they are libertine thinkers and would be a Libertine if they were politically active it is important to note politics is not at all a game.